This post is of course long overdue; by this time hardly anybody 
argues about Brexit anymore, ordinary people just yell “Bring it on 
now!” and “Cancel it altogether!”, while politicians are unabashedly 
using any methods they can find for their own particular goals.
But while we still had a argument, as opposed to a shouting match, I 
found out that, while myself favouring Scotland out of the EU and out of
 the UK, I could understand better those who wanted Scotland in the UK 
and the UK in the EU than those who wanted it to stay in (whichever) one
 of these Unions but leave the other.
Because it seemed to me that the vast majority of people in these 
latter two groups were always waxing lyrical about the advantages of 
local government, when talking about the Union they didn’t like, and 
presaging economical doom and glory if leaving the Union they liked.
Many years ago I was present at a business meeting when at one point 
one negotiator accused his opponent, “But half an hour ago you were 
using the very opposite argument!” Upon which the latter, quite cooly 
and with just the ghost of a smile, retorted, “Sure, because it was 
convenient for me.” Immediately the atmosphere changed from tense to 
relaxed.
Trouble is, back then we weren’t discussing anything that would have 
any direct personal impact on any of us, so he could admit this use of 
double standards. After all, we were not presenting ourselves as 
paragons of wisdom and virtue either.
	  
 (originally posted on Tumblr)